Skip to main content

Giant Butterbur vs Enokitake: shared flavor compounds

202 of 211 flavor compounds are shared (Jaccard 0.96) — the molecular basis for whether Giant Butterbur and Enokitake pair well or work as substitutes. Full side-by-side breakdown below.

1
2

Two ingredients gives the full side-by-side breakdown; add a third to see a similarity matrix across all of them (up to 6).

202
Shared
206
Giant Butterbur reported
207
Enokitake reported
0.96
Jaccard
Thin evidence for this pair. We hold no distinguishing chemistry for enokitake: every compound on it appears in more than 10% of ingredients, so this score is computed over the background every food shares. Distinguishing compounds held — Giant Butterbur: 4, Enokitake: 0. The graph median is 12.

“Reported” counts reflect the compounds characterized for each ingredient across the studies and databases we aggregate — a measure of coverage, not an exhaustive census. Different analyses target different compound classes and methods, so read these as what has been characterized, not the total number of molecules present. Jaccard measures shared coverage, so it rewards overlap rather than highlighting the ratio differences that distinguish two ingredients.

Why they pair: shared-compound network

12 of 202 shared shown

Each molecule in the middle is shared by both ingredients — the chemistry bridging Giant Butterbur and Enokitake. Node color is chemical class and node size is perceptual potency (bigger = lower odor threshold, so it drives aroma at smaller amounts); a copper ring marks compounds flagged as key aromas in published GC-O studies. Zoom with the +/− buttons or a pinch, drag the background to pan, drag a node to pin it, click any molecule for its full profile.

Showing the 12 highest-impact of 202 shared compounds (key aromas first). Sign in for the full network, including the compounds unique to each ingredient.

Where they differ: aroma character

Profile distance 0.02

The Jaccard above measures overlap; this compares each ingredient’s aroma-family mix side by side — the wider the gap between the two bars, the more that family sets the ingredients apart. Giant Butterbur reads left, Enokitake reads right.

18.2%
Other
19.6%
2.1%
Chemical
1.1%
15.5%
Sour
15.9%
12.8%
Floral
12.7%
10.2%
Fruity
10.1%
10.2%
Green
10.1%
7.0%
Herbal
6.9%
8.6%
Roasted
8.5%
1.1%
Caramel
1.1%
1.6%
Citrus
1.6%
Giant Butterbur ◀ ▶ Enokitake

Shares are fractions of each ingredient’s labeled compounds (186 of 206 for Giant Butterbur, 188 of 207 for Enokitake) — compositional lean, not concentration. Aroma labels come from our compound enrichment and cover most, but not all, characterized molecules.

Pro names the molecules behind each difference — the specific compounds in each aroma family that one ingredient has and the other doesn’t. Sign in to see them.

Published recipes using both

No published recipes in our corpus use both giant butterbur and enokitake together — if the compound overlap above is strong, this is exactly the kind of novel pairing worth testing.

Shared compounds

202 of 211 total

These are the molecules both ingredients have in common — the chemistry behind why they pair. Grouped by chemical class; ★ marks compounds flagged as key aromas in published GC-O studies. Click any molecule for its identifiers (CAS, formula, PubChem CID), odor data, and every ingredient it’s found in.

Most perceptually potent shared compounds

132 of 202 shared are aroma compounds with a measured threshold

Odor threshold is the concentration at which a molecule becomes smellable — lower = more potent. These clear their threshold most easily, so they drive the shared aroma out of proportion to the raw shared count.

Showing the 6 most potent of 132 with measured thresholds. Sign in for the full ranked list.

Showing the 5 highest-impact of 202 shared compounds (key aromas first) — sign in for the full list, grouped by chemical class with key-aroma markers.

See 4 giant butterbur-only and 5 enokitake-only compounds with Pro

Side-by-side ingredient comparison — including the unique compounds in each ingredient — is a Pro feature.

Try the pairing tools for full recipe-aware scoring, or explore giant butterbur's profile.

Cite this analysis
Plain text
Compound Kitchen (2026). Compound similarity analysis: Giant Butterbur vs Enokitake. https://compkitchen.com/compare?a=giant%20butterbur&b=enokitake. Accessed 2026-09-29.
BibTeX
@misc{compkitchen_compare_compound_similarity_analysis_giant_butterbur_vs_enokitake_2026,
  title  = {Compound similarity analysis: Giant Butterbur vs Enokitake},
  author = {{Compound Kitchen}},
  year   = {2026},
  url    = {https://compkitchen.com/compare?a=giant%20butterbur&b=enokitake},
  note   = {Accessed: 2026-09-29}
}

Methodology DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19719459 · CC BY 4.0 · Citations are a request, not a requirement.