Skip to main content

Mastic Gum vs Walnut: shared flavor compounds

12 of 360 flavor compounds are shared (Jaccard 0.03) — the molecular basis for whether Mastic Gum and Walnut pair well or work as substitutes. Full side-by-side breakdown below.

1
2

Two ingredients gives the full side-by-side breakdown; add a third to see a similarity matrix across all of them (up to 6).

12
Shared
48
Mastic Gum reported
324
Walnut reported
0.03
Jaccard

“Reported” counts reflect the compounds characterized for each ingredient across the studies and databases we aggregate — a measure of coverage, not an exhaustive census. Different analyses target different compound classes and methods, so read these as what has been characterized, not the total number of molecules present. Jaccard measures shared coverage, so it rewards overlap rather than highlighting the ratio differences that distinguish two ingredients.

Why they pair: shared-compound network

12 of 12 shared shown

Each molecule in the middle is shared by both ingredients — the chemistry bridging Mastic Gum and Walnut. Node color is chemical class and node size is perceptual potency (bigger = lower odor threshold, so it drives aroma at smaller amounts); a copper ring marks compounds flagged as key aromas in published GC-O studies. Zoom with the +/− buttons or a pinch, drag the background to pan, drag a node to pin it, click any molecule for its full profile.

Where they differ: aroma character

Profile distance 0.53

The Jaccard above measures overlap; this compares each ingredient’s aroma-family mix side by side — the wider the gap between the two bars, the more that family sets the ingredients apart. Mastic Gum reads left, Walnut reads right.

34.1%
Fruity
8.4%
0.0%
Sour
17.2%
0.0%
Other
14.9%
26.8%
Floral
12.2%
19.5%
Herbal
8.8%
0.0%
Roasted
6.8%
2.4%
Woody
7.4%
0.0%
Sulfurous
2.7%
0.0%
Chemical
1.7%
4.9%
Spicy
3.4%
Mastic Gum ◀ ▶ Walnut

Shares are fractions of each ingredient’s labeled compounds (41 of 48 for Mastic Gum, 295 of 324 for Walnut) — compositional lean, not concentration. Aroma labels come from our compound enrichment and cover most, but not all, characterized molecules.

Pro names the molecules behind each difference — the specific compounds in each aroma family that one ingredient has and the other doesn’t. Sign in to see them.

Published recipes using both

1 found

Real dishes from our 610K+ curated recipe corpus that combine mastic gum and walnut — proof the pairing works in practice.

Shared compounds

12 of 360 total

These are the molecules both ingredients have in common — the chemistry behind why they pair. Grouped by chemical class; ★ marks compounds flagged as key aromas in published GC-O studies. Click any molecule for its identifiers (CAS, formula, PubChem CID), odor data, and every ingredient it’s found in.

Most perceptually potent shared compounds

11 of 12 shared are aroma compounds with a measured threshold

Odor threshold is the concentration at which a molecule becomes smellable — lower = more potent. These clear their threshold most easily, so they drive the shared aroma out of proportion to the raw shared count.

Showing the 6 most potent of 11 with measured thresholds. Sign in for the full ranked list.

Showing the 5 highest-impact of 12 shared compounds (key aromas first) — sign in for the full list, grouped by chemical class with key-aroma markers.

See 36 mastic gum-only and 313 walnut-only compounds with Pro

Side-by-side ingredient comparison — including the unique compounds in each ingredient — is a Pro feature.

Try the pairing tools for full recipe-aware scoring, or explore mastic gum's profile.

Cite this analysis
Plain text
Compound Kitchen (2026). Compound similarity analysis: Mastic Gum vs Walnut. https://compkitchen.com/compare?a=mastic%20gum&b=walnut. Accessed 2026-09-28.
BibTeX
@misc{compkitchen_compare_compound_similarity_analysis_mastic_gum_vs_walnut_2026,
  title  = {Compound similarity analysis: Mastic Gum vs Walnut},
  author = {{Compound Kitchen}},
  year   = {2026},
  url    = {https://compkitchen.com/compare?a=mastic%20gum&b=walnut},
  note   = {Accessed: 2026-09-28}
}

Methodology DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19719459 · CC BY 4.0 · Citations are a request, not a requirement.