Skip to main content

Shrimp vs Tomato: shared flavor compounds

106 of 576 flavor compounds are shared (Jaccard 0.18) — the molecular basis for whether Shrimp and Tomato pair well or work as substitutes. Full side-by-side breakdown below.

1
2

Two ingredients gives the full side-by-side breakdown; add a third to see a similarity matrix across all of them (up to 6).

106
Shared
164
Shrimp reported
518
Tomato reported
0.18
Jaccard

“Reported” counts reflect the compounds characterized for each ingredient across the studies and databases we aggregate — a measure of coverage, not an exhaustive census. Different analyses target different compound classes and methods, so read these as what has been characterized, not the total number of molecules present. Jaccard measures shared coverage, so it rewards overlap rather than highlighting the ratio differences that distinguish two ingredients.

Why they pair: shared-compound network

12 of 106 shared shown

Each molecule in the middle is shared by both ingredients — the chemistry bridging Shrimp and Tomato. Node color is chemical class and node size is perceptual potency (bigger = lower odor threshold, so it drives aroma at smaller amounts); a copper ring marks compounds flagged as key aromas in published GC-O studies. Zoom with the +/− buttons or a pinch, drag the background to pan, drag a node to pin it, click any molecule for its full profile.

Showing the 12 highest-impact of 106 shared compounds (key aromas first). Sign in for the full network, including the compounds unique to each ingredient.

Where they differ: aroma character

Profile distance 0.24

The Jaccard above measures overlap; this compares each ingredient’s aroma-family mix side by side — the wider the gap between the two bars, the more that family sets the ingredients apart. Shrimp reads left, Tomato reads right.

15.1%
Roasted
4.6%
0.0%
Herbal
7.9%
10.1%
Sulfurous
3.1%
0.6%
Woody
5.5%
0.6%
Spicy
4.4%
13.8%
Floral
11.4%
1.9%
Caramel
4.2%
12.6%
Fruity
14.7%
11.3%
Other
9.4%
15.1%
Sour
13.6%
Shrimp ◀ ▶ Tomato

Shares are fractions of each ingredient’s labeled compounds (159 of 164 for Shrimp, 456 of 518 for Tomato) — compositional lean, not concentration. Aroma labels come from our compound enrichment and cover most, but not all, characterized molecules.

Pro names the molecules behind each difference — the specific compounds in each aroma family that one ingredient has and the other doesn’t. Sign in to see them.

Published recipes using both

100+ found

Real dishes from our 610K+ curated recipe corpus that combine shrimp and tomato — proof the pairing works in practice.

99+ more recipes use both ingredients. Pro shows up to 10 published dishes per comparison — a head-start for menu development and recipe testing.

Shared compounds

106 of 576 total

These are the molecules both ingredients have in common — the chemistry behind why they pair. Grouped by chemical class; ★ marks compounds flagged as key aromas in published GC-O studies. Click any molecule for its identifiers (CAS, formula, PubChem CID), odor data, and every ingredient it’s found in.

Most perceptually potent shared compounds

82 of 106 shared are aroma compounds with a measured threshold

Odor threshold is the concentration at which a molecule becomes smellable — lower = more potent. These clear their threshold most easily, so they drive the shared aroma out of proportion to the raw shared count.

Showing the 6 most potent of 82 with measured thresholds. Sign in for the full ranked list.

Showing the 5 highest-impact of 106 shared compounds (key aromas first) — sign in for the full list, grouped by chemical class with key-aroma markers.

See 58 shrimp-only and 413 tomato-only compounds with Pro

Side-by-side ingredient comparison — including the unique compounds in each ingredient — is a Pro feature.

Try the pairing tools for full recipe-aware scoring, or explore shrimp's profile.

Cite this analysis
Plain text
Compound Kitchen (2026). Compound similarity analysis: Shrimp vs Tomato. https://compkitchen.com/compare?a=shrimp&b=tomato. Accessed 2026-09-28.
BibTeX
@misc{compkitchen_compare_compound_similarity_analysis_shrimp_vs_tomato_2026,
  title  = {Compound similarity analysis: Shrimp vs Tomato},
  author = {{Compound Kitchen}},
  year   = {2026},
  url    = {https://compkitchen.com/compare?a=shrimp&b=tomato},
  note   = {Accessed: 2026-09-28}
}

Methodology DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19719459 · CC BY 4.0 · Citations are a request, not a requirement.